Thursday, June 3, 2010

The Farmers' Trading Company Building: Proposal for Registration

For the Culture and Heritage Planning course I did last year, I investigated the potential of the Farmers' building to be a heritage building registered with the Historic Places Trust.

The Farmers’ Trading Company Building was the main store of Farmers’, situated on Hobson Street in the Auckland city centre. Its large and imposing form has thus far survived in Auckland where many other old buildings have been demolished. Its current use as a hotel has used the R. A. Lippincott architecture for the Art Deco theme of the Heritage Hotel, whereas the other parts of the store's history, its multitude of buildings and their various additions, and features such as the roof-top playground, are less obvious.



The facade


The tea room

(Photographs by Patrick Clearwater.)

Here are some of the reasons I thought it was worth protecting:

On the top floor of the annexe towards the back of the building is the tea room, with stone walls, an elegant vaulted and patterned ceiling, cast iron light fittings and large windows with views of the harbour.

Everyone shopped at the Farmers’ store. People have memories of the store. Tea rooms, department stores and shopping in the city centre were part of the culture in Auckland, and form part of its social history. The store included a large number of exciting modernisations and was involved in many events in the city.

The Farmers’ Trading Company Building is significant in this respect because it remains a source of memories, creates reactions and makes people think about other people, other times and other perspectives.

It is exciting for people to imagine past events occurring: memories and thinking can create emotions in people and make them feel part of something larger.

The visual form of the building—its size, its Art Deco facade that joins the buildings within it together—reveals part of the history of the store: its rapid growth.

The Farmers Trading Company has historical value as being the site of part of Aucklands economic history. The prosperity and decline of Farmers’ matched the pattern of growth in department stores in New Zealand and overseas.

The store tells the story of Robert Laidlaw, who leaves a history of retail innovation shown by the store’s continual updating and modernisation with the latest technology and retailing methods, such as the first large store car park and later multi-storey car park (still existing across the road from the store on Wyndham Street).

Graphic Communication

I think it's interesting how much graphic communication may influence people's views on planning proposals.

For example, while I love their work, Andres Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk's town plans often have detailed illustration that borders on sentimental in its graphic style (such as in the book Andres Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk: Towns and Town-Making Principles, edited by Krieger, A. with Lennertz, W., 1991, New York: Rizzoli).



(Source: http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j301/randy4au/Trussville_11_08_08/06_other_photos/trussville_springs_01.jpg.)

And potentially misleading. All those street trees drawn in may be confusing the big picture.

Graphic communication can deliver new insights, too. Joost Grootens's maps, for example:



(Source: http://www.grootens.nl/2/10/11/3.html.)

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

The Density–Design Dilemma

I don't know how we can provide low-cost, well-designed medium-density housing. I think it is an issue at the intersection of architecture and planning.



The Pines, Mount Eden
(Source: http://fletchersince1909.com/gallery.php?g=19&category=.)

Herne Bay

(Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/80/Herne_Bay_Apartment_Skyscraper.jpg.)

Economics hasn't solved this issue. Some beautiful, high-density housing has been built in Auckland, but it is either designed for high-income groups, or it quickly becomes desirable to those groups.

More on Mount Albert Station

There seems to be an issue with the Auckland Regional Growth Strategy, if it is based on intensification of nodes and corridors, which on the isthmus are based on railway lines, and this is the state of the Mount Albert Station.


(Photograph by Patrick Clearwater.)

Conflicting Aims in Possible Growth Strategies for Auckland

A studio project on the redevelopment of a site in Mount Albert to address the current urban design issues, provide for higher densities of development, increase people’s use of the area, and of public transport, and be economically viable over time required an understanding of the Auckland City Growth Management Strategy and how it might be implemented. The area chosen was at the Mount Albert train station.




(Photograph by Patrick Clearwater.)

This project showed me the complexity of dealing with traffic, arterial roads, public transport and growth. I offered the following critique of how far the Auckland City Council growth strategy allowed achieving all these aims together.

The Growth Strategy identifies Mount Albert as one centre of growth in Auckland City. The strategy states that the purpose of redevelopment is to enhance existing public transportation facilities, education institutions, recreation spaces, community services and business activities, and to create a vibrant Mount Albert town centre. Also that development should focus on residential growth and create a place that offers a range of activities.


There are some conflicts between the selected urban design criteria and the process of development that the strategy envisages. Peter Calthorpe suggests that arterials and thoroughfares should not pass through transit-oriented developments, and that arterial traffic should not be slowed by the activities within them, to support an efficient regional traffic system (The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, community and the American Dream, 1993, New York, Princeton Architectural Press). He says that the commercial cores of centres and associated transit stops should be to one side of the arterial. In addition, the type of transit that he describes tends to be either light rail or buses, neither of which creates the barriers of a heavy rail line, so the adverse effect of the railway barrier in Mount Albert is likely to be greater than what Calthorpe describes.

People + Places + Spaces suggests the ostensibly opposite principle of focusing walkable nodes on arterials and public transport so that they benefit from the movement economy (Ministry for the Environment, People + Places + Spaces: A design guide for urban New Zealand, 2002, Wellington). Both the Auckland City Growth Strategy and the Regional Growth Strategy follow this principle: almost all centres of growth are on arterial roads. Perhaps the issue this principle addresses is that of retaining landscapes that people value, by retaining the usually historical routes of arterial roads. Or perhaps the suggestion is that retaining these routes, and gradually increasing the connectedness and permeability of the street network, may decrease the need for cars to dominate particular roads.

This principle is compatible with the incremental development recommended by the growth strategy. However, in creating a plan of development for the site chosen in Mount Albert, it was found to be necessary to create a plan for a much wider area than just the one hectare site, which the strategy does not require. For example, the overall density of the area surrounding the train station is required to be 40 dwellings per hectare. For the purposes of the development project, a density of 60 dwellings per hectare was presumed to be an appropriate density the particular site, at the centre of Mount Albert.

In the short term, increased density of development cannot address the barriers of the arterial roads and the railway line. Despite the fact that the final proposal for development increased the level of permeability between the two sides of New North Road, the busy and noisy New North Road still a major barrier for pedestrians. It is suggested that shopping streets for pedestrians should be located in streets through which traffic does not pass at all. There is an opportunity in that the Regional Arterial Road Plan no longer classifies New North Road as a regional arterial, because of future extensions of State Highway 20, and so the need for the road to cater primarily for vehicular traffic may decrease.

Appendix H to the Auckland Regional Policy Statement states that the average 200 employees per hectare is for the zoned employment areas within the centre or corridor. In Mount Albert this is the existing 3 hectares of zoned business land in accordance with the Auckland City Council’s District Plan. The purposed increase of employment density is thus limited to the existing business zoned areas, which are mainly located along New North Road. This may contradict with the Auckland City Growth Management Strategy, which proposed Mount Albert to be an Urban Living Community of residential growth and mixed-use town centres. The ideal of mixed use development would not be able to occur outside this area. The growth strategy anticipates the centres on the railway line to be self-sufficient, while also encouraging people to move between each centre along the railway, but a limit on the area that should be mixed use will not achieve this, because active edges beyond the town centre that encourage residents to walk to the station are not required.

In order to make this development proposal feasible, a technical analysis of the feasibility was undertaken. The growth strategy requires a certain level of density, and to make a profit while providing this required a further increase in the residential density on the site. This is shown by the fact that a density of 60 dwellings per hectare was not feasible. The growth strategy favours incremental development. However, individual developers may not be able to negotiate to form the new streets that can give amenity to the higher density development. The street height–width ratio, and detail planning at the human scale may not be considered by developers.

Monday, May 31, 2010

Heritage in the Auckland City Centre

For the Culture and Heritage Planning course we had an assignment option of identifying and recommending for protection some heritage places.

I think my interest in this topic is how heritage can be defined—potentially, heritage includes everything. So how to decide what to protect?

I have a penchant for modern architecture and grand and exciting buildings. I am always hearing people complain of bad 1980s architecture or how terrible mirror glass is, but these buildings could be the heritage of the future. I was initially worried that my choices of heritage places was a bit out there, but it was well received.

B. J. Ball Building (1959)


Milan Mrkusich's mural is on the side of the building:



The architectural form the B. J. Ball Building, particularly the white pilotis and long modern style, is significant for its contribution to the important site on the cliff above Fanshawe Street.

Farmers' department store building (1931)

On Hobson Street, with facade and the tea rooms on the top floor being designed by R. A. Lippincott, who also designed the Auckland University clock tower building.



The interior of the tea rooms has aesthetic significance, and is fully intact. The facade actually joins together a number of smaller warehouses into a large and impressive building. This exemplifies Art Deco style, and the way this was used to advance the modern image of the Farmers’ department store reveals part of the store’s history.

Television New Zealand Network Centre (1989)

This one is my favourite. The mirrored and coloured glass were the latest technology and have created a form that is not defined by any sort of column structure. The architects Warren and Mahoney have a collection of buildings in downtown Auckland from this period.



The building has hard surfaces, curved lines and a shiny, reflective look. It has an exterior staircase with landings and an interesting, technology-populated roof. This, and the curved façade and stepped form of the
building make it an elegant example of postmodern architecture in the Auckland city centre.

[All photographs taken by Patrick Clearwater.]

Saturday, May 29, 2010

A Pattern Language

This website has a summary of Christopher Alexander's A Pattern Language (Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S. and Silverstein, M., with Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I. and Angel, S., 1977, A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction, New York: Oxford University Press). This book is quite inspiring in its articulation of urban design criteria, and I use it as a reference when I struggle to find the words to explain the ideas of urban form that I know are worthwhile and important.



(Image source: http://thearchitectstake.com/wpb/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/a-pattern-language-book-cover1.jpg.)

Some of the principles, such as 133 Staircase as a Stage—a staircase is not just a way to get from one floor to another, it is a space in itself; if the staircase is not treated as a room, it will be a dead spot, and disconnect the building—I felt like I had an instinctive understanding of, but had not articulated in the terms that Alexander uses or in so comprehensive and connected a way. This criterion is something that I had noticed in houses and buildings. Staircases are a space that connect two whole floors, and therefore play a key role in maintaining social connection. A large, central, exciting staircase means that people can see other people sitting, entering, and seeing for themselves.

The imagery used is interesting. Perhaps this is the 'pattern language' that he approaches across the whole work. It is a unique system of descriptions and nuances and metaphors in articulating verbally and physically the ideas and forms of the city. Other examples include 106 Positive Outdoor Space and 107 Wings of Light (another favourite of mine: buildings should be in narrow wings, so that no one is more than 5 metres from the natural light of a window). There is something more than just description going on here. Language makes a big difference on the way that we see things.